It’s hard to remember when we last wrote that the best thing on the New York City Ballet’s repertory program was a ballet by Peter Martins, but Thursday night was one of those times. The program underscored NYCB’s current dilemma which is reconciling what the audience wants to see with the unpopular selections curated by Wendy Whelan and the self-promoting influence of Justin Peck. Ticket-buying core audience members are being driven away by the mediocrity being ladled over the company’s strong brand ballets.
There was that time when Jerome Robbins decided to move on from trying to co-direct NYCB and allow Martins to do his job. We are there again; Whelan and Peck need to move on and stop interfering with the company’s programing of Balanchine’s greatest masterpieces in favor of the mostly junk like what was on the bill Thursday night.
The only choreographic highlight of Thursday night’s show was Zakouski, an offering of musical and dance hors d’oeuvres that Peter Martins created in 1992 for Margaret Tracy and Nikolaj Hübbe. The music chosen for the ballet came from the last quarter of the 19th century and the first quarter of the 20th — a compilation of Rachmaninoff, Stravinsky, Prokofiev, and Tschaikovsky, the last three composers dear to Balanchine’s heart — and was played passionately from the orchestra pit by violinist Kurt Nikkanen and pianist Hanna Hyunjung Kim.
The costumes by Barbara Matera seemed to be full of message, but what message? Joseph Gordon was wrapped in lovely plum while Megan Fairchild tried her best to wear the ostentatious fiery orange-red ruffled skirt thingy with strange sequin placement. She & ostentatious just don’t get along, never have; no worries, she always wins out anyway.
The choreography itself is a curious mix of passionate response to the music and analytical WWGBD, but it works. Transitioning from Rachmaninoff’s Volcalise right into Stravinsky’s Parasha’s Song requires some fancy footwork which Gordon possessed abundantly. On display was his inheritance of Martins’ contrasting weight-deep-into-the-ground that launched into sharply-sliced allegro. Then he added to it his own confidence and “let me show you this” enthusiasm. Fairchild’s feet and legs were humming along, bravely jumping up and down on pointe until they weren’t. Splat. But it was a great belly splat, right on her mark in the middle of the stage. Seemingly she was unhurt and moved through the rest of the choreography without hesitation or loss of focus giving it a stylish and warm treatment. The choreography for the woman is perplexing in that it initially looks like it was made for an adagio dancer with long limbs; then it seems to evolve into allegro for a shorter athletic dancer. In thinking back, Margaret Tracey was that type of dancer—able to master a mesmerizing, elongated Afternoon of a Faun and also ring the heck out of Liberty Bell.
Also on this bill was Gianna Reisen’s Signs, an embarrassing effort at replicating Twyla Tharp’s style to Philip Glass music reminiscent of Tharp’s In the Upper Room and other dances. Sappy, unimaginative, derivative, cliched — it bleated, “Please reward me for trying.” On NYCB’s stage, no choreographer gets rewarded just for trying. Either the work is great or it shouldn’t be there—let alone be there over and over again. Jeeze Louise, enuff already with this student showcase stuff.
Red Angels was totally watchable because of the strong casting of Mira Nadon, Taylor Stanley, Ashley Hod, and Jules Mabie. The casting sheet indicated that this was a debut for everyone but Nadon. However, we seem to recall watching Ashley Hod rip through this ballet with her fierce, seductive, razor sharp dancing at a summer BAAND Together performance in 2022 along with Davide Riccardo, Emilie Gerrity, and Peter Walker who were formally representing NYCB. Again Thursday night, she thrilled with her intensity which complemented Nadon’s burning heat and glamour, and melded with Jules Mabie like it had not occurred to us would happen. Taylor Stanley possessed the lithe limb and torso wriggle that is the mark of this Ulysses Dove dance. He scorched it in his own humble and modest way.
The company premiere of Justin Peck’s Heatscape was mostly difficult to sit through. Peck’s penchant for using other choreographer’s ideas to pump up his choreography is well-known. In this instance, the music by Bohuslav Martinů (Concerto No. 1 for Piano and Orchestra) generally pre-dates the Shostakovich concertos that Ratmansky has favored in many of his ballets but has a similar racing quality. Peck’s choreography clearly aims to be a knock-off of Ratmansky’s Concerto DHCR, Piano Concerto No. 1 and Namouna while claiming originality with cliches like a line of dancers running forward toward the audience. It’s hyper-kinetic while also being monotonous — some kind of achievement, we guess.
The costumes by Reid and Harriet were, of course, not stage worthy. Men in short legged boxer type 1950’s white tennis shorts and muscle shirts; the women in short tennis shifts. The temptation is to say that the costumes could not have been less appealing, but we know with Reid and Harriet ballet designs there’s never a lowest point; it can always get worse. The art design by Shepard Fairey featured a faded print of a red sun with star-face in the middle which we’ll swear we’ve seen on tee-shirts at Old Navy.
NYCB is spending an extraordinary $378K on Justin Peck for his “advice” and choreography. His effect on NYCB has been to lower the quality of what goes on its stage. That $378K could be better used to add a few Balanchine blockbusters to the fall season which was sorely lacking this year. In summary, the fall season in terms of repertory sucked mostly, and we’re glad it’s on its way out.
But let’s end on a positive note. Our H.H. Pump Bump Award, a Dolce & Gabbana red original from the old days, is bestowed upon Ashley Hod in Red Angels who continues to dance at a high principal level even without the appropriate recognition from management.

13 responses to “NYCB 9/25 questionable taste continues”
It has been an epidemic for years. Not just nycb but almost every American Co. Zero vision, no Brand identity and way too much Ego. In the meantime gorgeous dancers are being wasted ..
True what you say, Tony. If the universal goal is for every company to look the same and dance the same and perform the same works, well we’re on that track.
Exactly! The last thing I saw NYCB do that left me inspired was The Cage. #1, Alexa Maxwell was off the charts brilliant in that but, what struck me was the craft Robbins laid for Artists to immerse themselves . Same when I saw ABT do Petite Mort. Kylian set that up for the dancers to shine bc the craft is so thought out, timeless, elegant and a vehicle for Artists to be inspired. For me, what makes for great Choreography is the Choreographers allowing the dancers to take ownership with their direction. What makes great Directors is Vision for their Brand and them inspiring, coaching, teaching their Artists the fullfill their Artistic Potential.
Angelin Preljocaj’s Spectral Evidence was a fabulous addition to the rep, but apparently some people objected to the lighting design which was used to allude to the burning of the witches. The Robert Fairchild role could be worn well by Stanley, Walker, and Bolden and possibly others with theater leanings, like Charlie Klesa. There seems to be no interest by either NYCB or ABT in adding a Yuri Possikov ballet to the rep. He’s coming to town in November to show some of his Eugene Onegin that he’s making for SFB and the Joffrey. I’m interested in seeing and hearing what he has to say. It also might be worth exploring ideas by Guillaume Cote. What I object to is NYCB’s constant reaching for the amateur/novice/non-ballet choreographers who they pin hopes on without evidence of high skills. They’re more interested in acquiring media buzz than masterful choreography.
Agree!!!!!!!
There is another Peck at NYCB who has shown a penchant for programming and giving new talent opportunities. One would hope that NYCB would make use of her skills when she decides to retire.
Now there’s something to think about. I think the problem now is that there is too much collaboration with people who have self-interests or who want to see something programmed because they liked to dance in it years ago.
Former NYC-er (and now far away in Portland) but it might be nice to revive some of Melissa Barak’s works. She did several works for NYCB, some hit, some miss, but I enjoyed “A Simple Symphony”. I was less enthused about “Call Me Ben” but in addition to “A Simple Symphony”, I heard good things about “Telemann Overture Suite in E Minor” which she originally created for SAB.
Hi, Stef! NYCB could revive Twyla Tharp’s and Susan Stroman’s dances, too, instead of acting like they can’t live without Gianna Reisen’s drivel because they need a woman choreographer. Honestly, I think Melissa Barak might be a hard sell given the memory of Call Me Ben.
Hi Haglund!
I’m going to gently push back a bit … mostly because I enjoyed A Simple Symphony, Benjamin Britten’s music is wonderful and accessible, and it was nice to have some actual plotless dancing that used the classical vocabulary.
Every choreographer, even the big and popular ones, has had a work that wasn’t good. My push back is that one (large, full length, ambitious) failure shouldn’t be a death knell of a career. More established choreographers have been afforded opportunities to continue to create, even with a dud … two or three even.
As for Tharp and Stroman, the Robbins/Tharp “Brahms/Handel” would be lovely to see. I personally wasn’t too fond of the Stroman works I saw (“Double Feature”, “For the Love of Duke”) because though they were great for spectacle, there wasn’t as much dancing.
Would be great to see Agon, 4 Ts, Serenade and all the smaller Balanchine/Robbins duets.
I am trying to get my head around Justin Peck’s salary. I am not sure there is anyone in world who is worth this salary no matter the job.
Peck should at least reimburse NYCB for his failures, but instead, he persuades them to throw more money at him. Maybe a bio-ballet based on PT Barnum should be next.