ballet blog with occasional diversions

NYCB 10/1 — The Goldberg Variations, Tschaikovsky Suite No. 3

You know, a piano performance of Bach’s The Goldberg Variations can range from 39 minutes to 92 minutes depending on whether all the repeats are played. Some pianists have skipped the repeats to make them fit onto a recording or because they’re, well, repeats. We cautiously mention this while being fully aware of the risk of inadvertently prompting New York City Ballet to suddenly decide, “Oh gosh, let’s add a See the Music session on The Goldberg Variations program” in order to make the audience truly appreciate all the repetitions that they are hearing and seeing on the stage. Repeating the repetitions repeatedly is not the way to the New York City Ballet audience’s heart. We’ll try not to repeat that.

Thursday evening’s performance of Robbins’ The Goldberg Variations and Balanchine’s Tschaikovsky Suite No. 3 had some good moments, most of which came after the intermission. Goldberg’s highlight, besides the committed and lovely piano playing by guest artist William Wolfram, was the vivacious dancing of Ashley Hod with Jules Mabie and a surprisingly gallant and maturing Andres Zuniga with Emma Von Enck. They with the others skedaddled around, paused for long looks into someone’s eyes, and then meandered off only to return later to essentially the same music. There were points in the ballet where it seemed Robbins’ was saying “Oh heck, if Bach can repeat himself then so can I” and then we would see something that reminded us of Afternoon of a Faun or Fancy Free or Interplay or Dances at a Gathering.

The evening caught a big breath of fresh air when Tschaikovsky Suite No. 3 began. Emily Kikta and Peter Walker danced the Elegie gloriously, but we’re not sold on them dancing together; their physicality is very different and not well balanced. When is the day going to come when we see Emily joined by the huge and hugely elegant Owen Flacke for a spin around the stage? Listen, Flacke and Charlie Klesa were dancing like there was no tomorrow in the demis section of Theme and Variations. At one point, they took our eyes away from the principals. 

The highlight of the evening was Ashley Laracey with Alec Knight in the second movement Valse Melancolique. There is such unique and compelling beauty in Ashley’s musicality and dramatic shading along with crystal clear work by the legs and feet that it is baffling why NYCB doesn’t grant this long-time soloist the respect and recognition that she deserves. Worth repeating: It is never too late to do the right thing.

India Bradley and KJ Takahashi flew through the Scherzo section without making much of an impression. While Takahashi may fit well into Justin Peck’s repertory, he doesn’t particularly please in other ballets because he tends to dance them like they are Justin Peck sneaker ballets. There is high energy and fierce allegro but no lines, no drama, no elegance, no personality, no legs. India was lovely on her first entrance but then struggled with some of the trickier turns. She danced with her chin and head up but her eyes focused down much of the time.

Theme and Variations performed by Tiler Peck and Roman Mejia with demi-soloist roles danced by senior corps & soloists kicked a good amount of life into the evening. The tempi may not have challenged Tiler enough to bring out her spectacular brand of chase, but she certainly was no slouch. It just looked a little too comfortable and easy for her. The clarity and phrase shaping was amazing as was her rapport with Roman who we have to accept is never going to express elegance & chivalry when there’s an opportunity to strut. That said, the relaxed tempi was such that there was more than enough time in the pirouette/double tour series for him to attempt double pirouette/double tour, but he played it safe and delivered a steady, clear ending to the variation. His caring and careful partnering made us appreciate another side of him.

If the order of this program had been reversed, we would have bought tickets to every performance throughout the week and left at intermission. As it is, we’re only going to see one cast. NYCB should re-think its programing strategy, if there is one, so that it encourages people to come instead of repelling them.

Our H.H. Pump Bump Award, Venus by Badgley Mischka, is bestowed upon Ashley Laracey for her defining performance in Valse Melancolique.

6 responses to “NYCB 10/1 — The Goldberg Variations, Tschaikovsky Suite No. 3”

  1. Yukionna Avatar
    Yukionna

    I’m ashamed to admit but I have yet to make it through Goldberg without dozing off in Part I. I miss about half of Part I, despite my best efforts to remain conscious. I love Part II, though. Tiler and Chun, in particular, were phenomenal. Honestly, I prefer their partnership more than Tiler and Roman, which can get a bit excessively hammy.

    Indiana had a decent debut in T&V. I have the Kirkland/Baryshnikov broadcast permanently burned into my brain, so it’s a bit of an unfair comparison. In both her variations, she starts out very strong, but shows signs of losing just a bit of momentum in her turns towards the end. It looked like she was playing it a bit safe and making sure she finishes with the music. But there’s something so thrilling about someone who can sustain the high energy and still finish instantly, so it feels like the phrase ends with an exclamation mark rather than a period.

    Miriam Miller and Ryan Tomash have excellent chemistry together. Just wonderful in the Elegie. I also saw them in the Balanchine Swan Lake, and they were fabulous in that, too, despite it being a very flawed abridged version of the ballet. I hope management keeps pairing them.

    I wish Ulbricht is cast more. It’s actually upsetting how little we see him on stage when his dancing is still at such a high level. Find a short girl for him!

    1. Haglund Avatar
      Haglund

      Hi, Yukionna. Thanks for the comments on the alternate casts. I have not yet seen Ryan Tomash and am anxious to do so.

      One trick I used to get through Goldberg without falling asleep was to practice pressing my scapulas against the back of my seat, hold for 15 seconds, and release. Repeat, repeat, repeat – every time the music or the steps repeated. I imagine the person sitting behind me wondered what I was doing – if they weren’t already asleep – but it was a more useful way to spend the time than dozing off and risk starting to drool upon myself.

  2. Eulalia Johnson Avatar
    Eulalia Johnson

    Greetings, Haglund. I saw this program at the October 4 matinee and had the strangest experience. The Goldberg put me in a hypnogogic state. Though my eyes were open and I was aware of what was going on on stage at all times, I was also at moments seeing to the back wall of my consciousness, so to speak, observing thoughts take on form to dance their own choreography. Should this prove a once in a lifetime experience, my gratitude for it is as immeasurable as for the dancing and the pianism of William Wolfram whose achievement won him the loudest cheers at the calls.

    The Tschaikovsky Suite No. 3 was at first a shocking change of musical and choreographic environment until it struck me that what I might be watching was Balanchine recreating with love the dance influences upon his boyhood. Puzzling to me was the scrim and dim lighting during the first sections while ghosts of “Corsaire” and “Bayadère” haunted the male protagonists–but when the scrim vanished, the lights went up to dazzling and the vivid costumes blazed with color and glitter, I met Balanchine having collected and metabolized his youthful inspirations to make of them his reshaping of classical dance. For me, it was choreography as chronology and autobiography culminating in the Tema con Variazioni where Balanchine found himself gloriously in the present moment which is where dance–all performing art, for that matter–must be. Is there a composer other than Tschaikovsky who invites one’s heart chakra to open so fully as his music does at the conclusion of this ballet? All I can say of the dancing is that it is a perpetual mystery why Ashley Laracey is not a principal and a confirmation of justice at work that Tiler Peck and Roman Mejia are such.

    1. Haglund Avatar
      Haglund

      Thanks, Eulalia.

      The last time NYCB danced Goldberg Variations, I observed just prior to the performance an audience member hogging the water fountain — gulp, gulp, gulping away. When someone in line behind him commented, he replied, “I have to hydrate; it’s Goldberg.” The audience was under stress even before it started.

      I’ve always had a hard time connecting the music of T&V to the rest of Suite. The first three parts have such an urgency and freedom along with an upward, almost celestial trajectory. Then comes along T&V which is so grounded and formally organized. It was interesting to read that Tchaikovsky originally planned to use his Contrastes (Fantaisie de Concert) as part of Suite No. 3 but then discarded the music. It almost seems like it would fit better as a final movement and is more in keeping with the other parts. It’s also quite a bit zippier than T&V, and there would be no chance for a double pirouette/double tours combination — even if someone wanted to try.

  3. Eulalia Johnson Avatar
    Eulalia Johnson

    Haglund, thank you for the above. I never come away from this blog and your comments and those of others without learning something. (I tanked up at the water cooler, too, by the way.)

    1. Haglund Avatar
      Haglund

      Thanks, Eulalia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *